Mobile Customer Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 22 January 2012

IBM's "Social Business" Needs To Be "UC-enabled"

Posted on 11:42 by Unknown
Copyright (C) Unified-View, All Rights Reserved.

It’s all about branding new business communications technology in order to associate new products and, more importantly, new services in the marketplace. The trick is in the definitions of the brand and catching the interest of who in a business organization will be interested and responsible for new business communications capabilities. This is particularly tricky as both business processes and communications with people converge as software that all can exploit the Web as services.

The biggest target used to be telephony for real-time person-to-person contacts, but as more consumers started using screen-based endpoint devices, text messaging communications (email, IM, and mobile SMS) have rapidly become a practical alternative to real-time voice interfaces and connections. This shift was accelerated with the advent of multi-modal smartphones and tablets that not only make individual end users more accessible for both business and personal contacts, but also support “UC-enabled” applications to exploit voice or visual user interfaces.

Since Microsoft came in to the UC game at the desktop and mobile smartphones with its Lync software products, IBM has now jumped into the marketplace with a new brand, “Social Business,” that is intended to include US-enabled applications of all kinds. At their recent Lotusphere conference, IBM upgraded their older enterprise technologies to be part of their “Smart Cloud” and “Social Business” product and service offerings. In particular, they reinforced their role in consultative services to organizations that need help in identifying requirements and managing the migration to what I call “UC-enabled” applications.

One analyst who attended the Lotusphere conference was very impressed with the new directions of IBM, but never mentioned “UC” as part of his review (Bruce Guptill, Saugatuck research Alert). On the other hand, Irwin Lazar, from Nemertes, highlighted the need for “UC Management” in his No Jitter review of the Lotusphere conference. (See http://www.nojitter.com/post/232400454/inside-lotusphere)

“UC” is not going away but is being embedded under new labels for business communications. As mobile computer applications proliferate, they need the flexibility of UC for interoperability and, perhaps more importantly, the end user "experience" for multimedia User Interfaces. As far as I am concerned, “Social Business” is really another form of communications that has to become “UC-enabled!”

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • UC is More Than IP Telephony
    May 7, 2008 Confusion About IP Telephony vs. UC vs. Mobility vs. CEBP Art Rosenberg, The Unified-View Because the transition of ...
  • Say Goodbye to the Telephony User Interface (TUI)
    Copyright © 2007 Unified-View, All Rights Reserved Worldwide February 17, 2007 The Fading Away of the TUI – Long Live “Visual” Call and ...
  • (no title)
    AT&T Pushing Mobile Users To Their Public, Unified Messaging “Cloud”   By Art Rosenberg, The Unified-View / UC Strategies Expert  ...
  • ShoreTel Joins Mobile UC At The Desktop
    By Art Rosenberg, The Unified-View / UC Strategies Expert Whether you like it or not, all your employees are consumers too, and they are al...
  • "BYOC" For UC Driver Communication
    Copyright © 2012 The Unified-View, All Rights Reserved Worldwide November 10, 2012 “Bring Your Own Car” Hits Mobile UC By Art Rosenberg, Th...
  • Cisco Focuses On Mobile User Experiences
    Copyright © 2012 The Unified-View, All Rights Reserved Worldwide October 24, 2012 Cisco Going After “Multi-modal” User Experiences In ...
  • UC-Enabling End-user Notifications
    Copyright (C) Unified-View, All Rights Reserved.   While there has been much attention paid to simplifying business communications between p...
  • Should Voicemail Die or Join UC?
    July 12, 2008 The Voice of the Users – Should Voicemail Die or Change to Fit UC? Art Rosenberg, The Unified-View Michael Arrington...
  • Who Really Knows Business End User UC Needs?
    August 8, 2008 Who In The Enterprise Should Represent End User Needs for UC? Art Rosenberg, The Unified-View It’s getting very obvio...
  • "Mobile Apps" Need Multi-modal UC "Cloud" Services
    Copyright (C) Unified-View, All Rights Reserved. By Art Rosenberg, The Unified-View / UC Strategies Expert It’s getting very obvious that ...

Categories

  • analytics
  • ASAP Calling
  • contact center
  • contact center UC
  • Customer UC
  • Managing UC
  • Mobility
  • Smart-phones Affect Mobile UC
  • smartphones
  • TCO
  • TCU
  • UC
  • UC Analytics
  • UC Confusion
  • UC Cube

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (17)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2012 (32)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ▼  January (2)
      • Where Is "Unified Communications" Really Going?
      • IBM's "Social Business" Needs To Be "UC-enabled"
  • ►  2011 (14)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2010 (16)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2009 (23)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2008 (39)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2007 (23)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2006 (23)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile